Campaign for American Leadership in the Middle East
» Thursday, April 07, 2005
Schiavo Memo
» Tuesday, April 05, 2005
The FEC Project
This is about the blogs, which has become a special interest to me even tho I have not been at it very long. That said it does not mean that if it is being directed at just the blogs it is ok because it is about free speech and how the government control of politics on the internet will play out. That makes it a concern for all of us. The situation in calif (SF) where they want to legislate at the local level is of note at this stage in the debate. I feel that if you take money for banners and ads then that is something that should be addressed. Blogs like mine that don't have sponsors or ad revenue is another thing altogether. - fc
[Mike Krempansky of RedState.org, by the way, has been a godsend in reporting on these issues. These are issues on which the online right and left are much aligned.]
It's not just the FEC bloggers need to worry about. Local governments will likely try to get into the act, as this ridiculous San Francisco effort proves.
Just when you thought the Federal Election Commission had it out for the blogosphere, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors took it up a notch and announced yesterday that it will soon vote on a city ordinance (PDF) that would require local bloggers to register with the city Ethics Commission and report all blog-related costs that exceed $1,000 in the aggregate.
Blogs that mention candidates for local office that receive more than 500 hits will be forced to pay a registration fee and will be subject to website traffic audits, according to Chad Jacobs, a San Francisco City Attorney.
The entire Board is set to vote on the measure on April 5th, 2005. I wonder if they'll be forced to register their own blogs!
In 2004, the United States District Court ruled it illegal that the Internet be excluded from campaign finance laws. To address this, the FEC recently submitted a Draft Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Internet Communications. In this 48 page document, the FEC intended to address the following concerns:
The Federal Register today published its official Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding the regulation of political activities over the internet -- PDF - - HTML.
Comments are due on June 3, and as I've previous urged, if you have any comment you want to make to the FEC regarding these regulations, you do not need to be a lawyer or have a lawyer. It is your right and obligation as a citizen to email your comments directly to the FEC at internet@fec.gov, and I strongly encourage you to do so.
In 2004, the United States District Court ruled it illegal that the Internet be excluded from campaign finance laws. To address this, the FEC recently submitted a Draft Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Internet Communications. In this 48 page document, the FEC intended to address the following concerns:
1. Identification of Internet communications which might be construed as both "public" and "public political advertising," specifically when advertisements are placed on websites;
2. Invite comments on the definitions and scopes of "general campaign activity" and "public communication," specifically in regards to the Internet;
3. The use of political disclaimers on committee websites, advertisements, and mass e-mails;
4. Exempting certain volunteer activities on the Internet from being "contributions to" or "expenditures of" political campaigns.
5. Determining the scope of exception to campaign regulations for Internet media activity.
Forum Find Forum Find is the place to find forums of any nature. Discussions on topics such as politics, religion, webmaster resources, current events and much more! Create your own!
"If you look for the social economic motive, you will not have to wait for history to tell you what was propaganda and what was truth." - George Seldes
Sit up, join up, stir it up, get online, get in touch, find out who's raisinghell and join them. No use waiting on a bunch of wussy politicians." - Molly Ivins
Page Created Under the gnu free documentation license and is presented as fair use and
internet linking. 'Fair Use' of copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 information on this site is presented without profit for research and educational purposes.
My respect for the free speech rights of others doesn't translate into a personal obligation to provide a public venue for opinions with which I disagree. All comments are subject to my approval.
When the list reaches 30,000, a date and a word will be listed on the page. On that date, every weblog on the list agrees to make a single post with the word as the title. The content of the post should be about what you want for the world, whatever that may be. The purpose is not to make a particular political statement, but simply to make a noise. If 30,000 weblogs all post the same unusual word, it WILL be heard.